Going back in time (by date of book publication), today’s WWR article is a continuation of the events in and around Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, NC preceding and during the American Revolution. Though I hadn’t intended to make a series out of it, the source material and local connections are just too fascinating!
Last week’s introduction was Who’s Your Founding Father, published by David Fleming (2023). Today’s article dives into The First American Declaration of Independence? by Scott Syfert (2014).
Background: According to the traditional account, Colonel Thomas Polk summoned representatives from each militia company in Mecklenburg County to meet at the Charlotte courthouse on May 19, 1775. As delegates gathered, news arrived of the previous month’s battles at Lexington and Concord, inflaming anti-British sentiment. The representatives elected Abraham Alexander as chairman and John McKnitt Alexander as secretary.
A three-man committee drafted four resolutions, with the most significant declaring that “we the citizens of Mecklenburg county, do hereby dissolve the political bands which have connected us to the Mother Country, and hereby absolve ourselves from all allegiance to the British Crown” and asserting that the county’s inhabitants were “free and independent.” Captain James Jack was then tasked with carrying this declaration to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia.
Scott Syfert’s meticulously researched book tackles one of American history’s most enduring mysteries: Did residents of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, declare independence from Great Britain on May 20, 1775 – more than a year before the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence? This controversy, which has captivated historians and patriots for over two centuries, receives its most comprehensive treatment in Syfert’s balanced and engaging analysis.
Syfert, a Charlotte-based attorney and historian, aims to elevate the significance of the this action, arguing for its rightful place as a precursor to the more widely recognized Philadelphia Declaration of 1776.
The First American Declaration of Independence delves into a pivotal, yet often overlooked, moment in American history: the Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence. For anyone interested in the true origins of American independence and the often-complex narratives that shape our understanding of the past, Syfert’s book offers a compelling and thought-provoking read.
At the heart of Syfert’s argument is the assertion that the citizens of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, took a radical, unprecedented step on May 20, 1775. Just weeks after the battles of Lexington and Concord, and a full year before the Continental Congress adopted its Declaration, a committee in Charlotte reportedly declared their independence from Great Britain. The “MeckDec”, as it came to be known, allegedly renounced allegiance to the Crown, established local self-governance, and called for the formation of a provisional government.
The book begins by establishing the cultural and political backdrop that would make such an early declaration plausible. Syfert traces the settlement of Mecklenburg County by Scots-Irish Presbyterians who carried deep-seated grievances against British authority. These settlers had endured religious persecution in Ireland and continued to face discrimination in the American colonies, where their Presbyterian faith marked them as outsiders. He explores the local political landscape, the influence of key figures, and the prevailing sentiments that made such a declaration not only possible but, in the eyes of its proponents, necessary.
The author demonstrates how these grievances intensified when the British Privy Council in London voided colonial legislation that had granted the Mecklenburg settlers the right to establish Queen’s College and allowed their ministers to perform legal marriages. This betrayal, following their support of royal governor William Tryon against the Regulator movement in 1771, further alienated the community from British rule.
One of the book’s greatest strengths lies in Syfert’s rigorous approach to historical evidence. The Mecklenburg Declaration has long been shrouded in controversy, with some historians dismissing it as a fabrication or a misremembered account. Syfert confronts these doubts head-on, presenting a wealth of primary and secondary sources to bolster his claims. He examines contemporary newspaper accounts, personal testimonies, and official records, carefully dissecting the arguments for and against the Declaration’s authenticity. While acknowledging the challenges posed by the loss of original documents (reportedly destroyed in a fire around April 1800), Syfert builds a strong circumstantial case, drawing connections between various pieces of evidence that, when viewed collectively, suggest the MeckDec was indeed a genuine expression of revolutionary sentiment. His detailed analysis of the language used, comparing it to other revolutionary documents of the era, further strengthens his position, highlighting the striking similarities in tone and intent to later declarations of independence.
Beyond the historical detective work, Syfert’s narrative is remarkably engaging. He avoids the dry, academic tone that can sometimes plague historical texts, instead adopting a style that is both accessible and passionate. He brings the figures of 1775 Mecklenburg to life, allowing readers to understand the courage and conviction required to defy a powerful empire. The book is not just a chronological account of events; it’s an exploration of the motivations, fears, and aspirations of ordinary people caught in extraordinary times. Syfert skillfully weaves together local anecdotes with broader historical trends, demonstrating how the specific circumstances in Mecklenburg County mirrored, and perhaps even influenced, the larger movement towards American independence.
However, it is important to note that the debate surrounding the Mecklenburg Declaration’s authenticity continues among historians. While Syfert presents a compelling case, readers should be aware that his interpretation is not universally accepted. Some scholars maintain that the “Mecklenburg Declaration” was either a later misremembering of the less radical “Mecklenburg Resolves” (which called for local governance but not outright independence) or a complete fabrication. Syfert addresses these counter-arguments, but the book ultimately serves as a powerful advocate for the Declaration’s legitimacy. This ongoing scholarly discussion, far from detracting from the book, actually enhances its value, as it encourages readers to critically engage with historical evidence and consider multiple perspectives.
Scott Syfert’s The First American Declaration of Independence is an essential read for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the American Revolution. It is a testament to the power of local initiative and the diverse origins of the independence movement. Syfert’s meticulous research, combined with his engaging narrative style, makes a strong case for the Mecklenburg Resolves as a significant, albeit controversial, milestone in the journey towards American self-governance. Whether one fully accepts the Declaration’s authenticity or remains skeptical, Syfert’s work undeniably enriches our appreciation for the complex tapestry of events that led to the birth of the United States. It challenges conventional narratives and reminds us that the seeds of liberty were sown in many places, by many hands, long before the grand pronouncements of Philadelphia.
A Note to Readers About Today’s (and many other) Wednesday Weekly Reader Articles
Today’s article – as well as many others you will read here – are based on the concept of synoptical reading. I first became aware of, and practiced, this type of reading in graduate school in the early 1980’s. Though intended primarily for scholarly reading, over the years I have found it also quite enjoyable for reading of all kinds, especially reading for the pure pleasure of reading.
Think of synoptical reading as the ultimate book conversation – it’s what happens when you gather multiple authors around the same topic and let them hash it out. Mortimer Adler and Charles Van Doren called this the highest form of reading in their classic How to Read a Book, and for good reason. Instead of just absorbing what one author tells you, synoptical reading involves collecting different books on the same subject and playing intellectual detective, looking for patterns, contradictions, and those “aha!” moments when seemingly unrelated ideas suddenly click together.
It’s like being a moderator at a debate where the participants wrote their arguments decades or even centuries apart. You’re not just reading – you’re orchestrating a dialogue between minds, asking tough questions, and building something new from the collision of different perspectives. This approach becomes incredibly powerful because it reveals how ideas evolve over time, exposes the blind spots that individual authors might miss, and often leads to insights that none of the original writers could have reached alone. In our current world of endless information streams, synoptical reading is less about consuming more content and more about becoming a thoughtful curator who can weave together the best thinking on complex topics into something genuinely illuminating.
Learn more about syntopical reading.
Part of a regular series on 27gen, entitled Wednesday Weekly Reader.
During my elementary school years one of the things I looked forward to the most was the delivery of “My Weekly Reader,” a weekly educational magazine designed for children and containing news-based current events.
It became a regular part of my love for reading, and helped develop my curiosity about the world around us.
Note: Header art by ©Dan Nance
27gen.com 